Beer Judge Certification Program (BJCP) Practice Test

Question: 1 / 400

Should the head judge at a table try to mentor apprentice judges if time allows?

Yes, it is encouraged

The correct choice highlights the importance of mentorship in the judging process. When head judges take the opportunity to mentor apprentice judges during a competition, they not only enhance the apprentice's understanding of beer styles and evaluation techniques but also foster a sense of community and support within the judging environment. This kind of training is beneficial not just for the apprentices but also for the growth of the overall judging program.

Mentorship encourages the sharing of knowledge, which can lead to better judging practices and a more educated pool of judges in the future. By taking the time to provide guidance, head judges can help apprentice judges build confidence in their tasting and evaluation skills, which is essential for their development as judges. Additionally, if time permits, this practice often results in a more engaged and knowledgeable judging panel, which can ultimately improve the quality of the competition.

This approach balances the need for rigorous judging with the professional growth opportunities that come from collaborative learning, making it a well-rounded practice in the BJCP community.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

No, they should focus solely on judging

Yes, but only during breaks

No, it can distract from the judging process

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy