During judging, how should judges handle personal biases about beer styles?

Judges must strive to evaluate beer based on style guidelines and objective criteria rather than personal biases. Leaving personal biases out of the evaluation ensures that judges remain impartial, providing a fair and consistent assessment of the beer being judged. This is essential for maintaining the integrity of the judging process, as biases can skew scores and compromise the accuracy of the evaluation.

Maintaining objectivity aligns with the principles of the Beer Judge Certification Program, where adherence to established style guidelines is crucial. By focusing solely on the attributes of the beer, judges can deliver more accurate and reliable feedback, fostering a fair competition environment where all participants are judged equally. This disciplined approach helps uphold the standards of the BJCP and enhances the overall quality of beer evaluation.