How should novice judges evaluate entries in a competition?

Evaluating entries in a competition can be a complex task that requires experience and a trained palate. Novice judges are generally encouraged to evaluate entries with the support of a BJCP judge, who can provide valuable guidance throughout the process. This support can help novice judges understand the judging criteria, improve their sensory evaluation skills, and ensure that the evaluations are consistent with established standards.

Having a experienced judge present can enhance the learning experience, fostering a deeper understanding of the styles being judged and the nuances of beer evaluation. This collaborative approach also helps novice judges build confidence in their abilities and develop their skills more effectively than if they were to evaluate entries entirely on their own.

The other options do not provide the same level of guidance and support that is beneficial for novice judges. Evaluating entries independently can lead to inconsistencies, and relying solely on written guidelines may not offer the practical context necessary for effective judging. Without prior authorization promotes a chaotic environment that may not abide by established procedures. Thus, having the support of an experienced BJCP judge is the most productive approach for novice judges in a competition setting.