If a beer receives a score above 40, is feedback for improvement necessary?

A beer that scores above 40 is generally considered to be of exceptional quality, often regarded as a top example within its style. When judging at this level, it indicates that the beer has met or exceeded the expectations for its criteria, including aspects like balance, complexity, and overall presentation.

In this context, feedback may not be deemed necessary because the score itself reflects that the beer is highly commendable and does not warrant significant improvements. Judges at this level typically focus on what makes the beer great rather than identifying shortcomings, as the primary goal is to celebrate high-quality offerings that excel in the brewing craft.

However, while constructive criticism can always provide value, the emphasis for these high-scoring beers is more on recognition rather than improvement, aligning with the idea that feedback should be tailored to the particular circumstances of each entry.