In each section of a scoresheet, should judges comment on only the most prominent features of each entry?

In the context of a scoresheet for beer evaluations, judges are expected to provide comprehensive feedback that encompasses all pertinent details of the entry. This means that while prominent features are certainly important, judges should not limit their comments to just those aspects. By noting all details, the judges can offer a more rounded critique that addresses various elements of the beer, such as aroma, appearance, flavor, mouthfeel, and overall impression.

This thorough approach ensures that the brewer can understand specific strengths and weaknesses in their beer beyond just the standout characteristics. It is valuable for the brewer's development and learning process, allowing them to refine their craft and improve future brews. Additionally, providing a detailed evaluation helps other judges and enthusiasts to appreciate the complexity and artistry behind each entry, rather than focusing solely on the most obvious traits.