Is it true that judges' comments must include a complete evaluation of the sensory aspects of the entry?

Judges' comments must indeed include a complete evaluation of the sensory aspects of the entry, which encompasses appearance, aroma, flavor, mouthfeel, and aftertaste. This thorough analysis is essential as it provides constructive feedback to the brewer, allowing them to understand how their beer is perceived in competition and where there may be areas for improvement.

A complete sensory evaluation helps ensure that judging is consistent and fair, maintaining the integrity of the competition. Additionally, it aligns with the BJCP guidelines, which emphasize the importance of detailed judging comments to foster the growth and education of brewers. The other options suggest limitations or exceptions to this requirement, but the standard practice is for all judges to offer a comprehensive sensory review regardless of the beer's score or specific competition rules.