Must judges' comments be constructive?

Judges' comments must be constructive because the purpose of providing feedback is to help brewers improve their craft. Constructive comments are focused on specific aspects of the beer, offering suggestions for enhancement while also recognizing positive attributes. This approach fosters a learning environment and encourages brewers to develop their skills and knowledge.

In the context of the judging process, comments that are solely critical without providing guidance do not serve the intended educational purpose. It is essential for feedback to be actionable, giving brewers a clear understanding of what can be improved upon. Furthermore, respecting the effort and creativity that goes into brewing by highlighting both strengths and weaknesses supports a positive experience for participants at all levels, whether they are amateurs or professional brewers. This aligns with the overall goals of the BJCP, which seeks to promote quality and education in brewing.