Should judges review the sub-style being judged from the BJCP Style Guidelines while at the judging table?

Judges should not review the sub-style being judged while at the judging table because the emphasis during judging should be on the immediate sensory evaluation of the beer in front of them. The judges are expected to have a thorough understanding of the BJCP Style Guidelines before stepping into the judging process. This prior knowledge enables them to assess each entry based on established criteria without distraction.

If judges were to look up the guidelines during the process, it could compromise their judgment and lead to inconsistencies. Instead, the judging session is designed for judges to rely on their training and experience, allowing them to make quick, objective assessments based on the actual tasting rather than getting sidetracked by readings or notes. This approach fosters a more efficient judging process and reinforces the judges' preparedness and expertise. Judges can revisit the guidelines after the session if needed, but during judging, it is crucial that they focus solely on the product at hand.