To ensure objectivity, what should judges avoid writing on the scoresheet?

Judges should avoid writing their full name and contact information on the scoresheet to maintain anonymity and objectivity during the judging process. This practice prevents any potential biases or influences that could arise from personal identification, ensuring that the evaluation of the beer is based solely on its characteristics and the guidelines set forth by the BJCP for that particular style. By keeping their identity concealed, judges can focus on providing an honest and impartial assessment of the entries without any external pressures or expectations impacting their scores.

Writing personal opinions about the beer could introduce subjectivity into the scores, impacting the integrity of the judging process. Including the beer style and brand might not be optimal either, as it could lead to biases based on preconceived notions about the brand. Specific scores for each category are essential for a structured evaluation and help convey precise feedback to the brewer, so it is important for judges to include those in their assessments.