What is common practice regarding sharing thoughts while judging?

In the context of beer judging, the common practice is to refrain from sharing thoughts until scoring is complete. This approach helps to maintain a level of objectivity and minimizes the influence of other judges’ opinions on an individual’s assessment. When judges discuss their impressions during the evaluation process, it can inadvertently sway their scores and lead to a consensus that may not accurately reflect each judge's independent appraisal of the beer's qualities. By waiting until scoring is complete to discuss evaluations, judges ensure that each assessment is based solely on their own perception and expertise, leading to a more accurate and balanced judging process. This procedure is designed to preserve the integrity of the scoring and foster honest, individual judgments.