What should a judge do if they encounter a serious defect in a sample?

In the context of judging beer samples, a serious defect refers to a significant flaw that adversely affects the overall quality of the brew. Documentation on the scoresheet is crucial because it provides an official record of the defect encountered, which is important for both the brewer and the competition organizers. This feedback facilitates learning and improvement for the brewer, allowing them to understand where their product may have gone wrong.

By documenting the defect, judges can help ensure that the competition maintains high standards through accountability and transparency. Additionally, having an accurate record is beneficial for any discussions that might occur later regarding the judging results or any potential re-evaluations of entries.

The other options do not promote the importance of communicating the findings adequately. Ignoring a minor defect overlooks the responsibility of the judge to assess and provide constructive criticism. Discussing it only with the head judge could limit the transparency of the judging process, and raising it to the competition director may not be necessary unless it has broader implications for the competition. By choosing to document it on the scoresheet, the judge performs their role responsibly, fostering an environment of improvement and high-quality standards.