When informing about flaws in a beer, are judges allowed to use phrases like "did you...?"

In the context of beer judging, it is crucial to maintain a professional and unbiased approach when evaluating entries. Using phrases like "did you...?" can introduce a subjective tone that may imply blame or suggest that the brewer made a mistake, which is not appropriate in a constructive critique. Judges are trained to provide feedback that is objective and focuses on the qualities of the beer rather than the actions of the brewer. This standard helps ensure that the feedback remains useful and fosters growth in the brewer's skills without discouraging them. Therefore, it is not acceptable to phrase observations in a way that could lead to a perceived confrontation or judgment of the brewer's abilities. A more appropriate way to provide feedback would be to describe the specific flaw without assigning it to the brewer's actions.